DiversityNursing Blog

By Jeroen Tas

Imagine a time when a device alerts you to the onset of a disease in your body long before it’s a problem. Or when your disease is diagnosed in Shanghai, based on the medical scan you did in Kenya. This future is far closer that you might think due to rapid advances in connected devices and sensors, big data and the integration of health services. Combined, these innovations are introducing a new era in healthcare and personal well-being.

In only a few years, mobile technologies have spawned tremendous innovation of consumer-level health tools. The emerging solutions are focusing on health conditions over a person’s lifetime and on holistic care. They generate constant insights through analytics and algorithms that identify patterns and behaviours. Social technologies enable better collaboration and interconnected digital propositions that reach out to communities of people with similar conditions, engaging them in ways which were never before possible.

We are starting to get a taste of what the consumerization of healthcare will mean in the future. In two to three years, analysing your personal health data will become commonplace for large parts of the population in many countries. Also, it is very likely that for the first time it will not be the chronically ill but the healthy people who will invest the most in managing their health.

Digitization and consumerization will rattle the healthcare industry. It is already tearing at the very fabric of the traditional healthcare companies and providers. Innovation is not only about just adding a new channel or connecting a product. It is also a complete redesign of business models, adjustment of systems and processes and, most importantly, it calls for changing the culture in companies to reflect the new opportunities – and challenges – presented by the digital world.

To drive true industry transformation, companies need to collaborate and continue to learn from each other. Great strides will be made in alliances, which, for example, will deliver open, cloud-based healthcare platforms that combine customer engagement with leading medical technology, and clinical applications and informatics.

The game will not only be played by the traditional healthcare providers. With consumerization, even companies without healthcare expertise, but with strong consumer engagement and trust, could potentially become healthcare companies. Big multinationals invest incremental budgets in developing new propositions and count on their global user bases or professional networks to gain a foothold in the market.

And in parallel, a raft of start-ups are attempting to transform the worlds of preventive or curative healthcare – in many cases, limited only by their imaginations. For example, we may see virtual reality technology moving from gaming industry to healthcare for improving patients’ rehabilitation after a stroke. Or we may see facial recognition software become common in monitoring and guiding patients’ daily medical routines.

While these new propositions tackle a number of healthcare industry’s core concerns and provide solutions to completely new areas, these propositions still need to mature. They need to become scalable, reliable, open, and the user experience needs to be harmonized.

But perhaps one of the most important challenges is related to people’s behaviour and preferences. Regardless of whether these new and existing companies are analysing health data, using virtual reality or reading people’s vital signs, they all need ample time to become trusted and accepted in the emerging digital health care space. Especially for the new entrants, obtaining the right level of credibility will be one of the key success factors.

Consumers, patients and professionals alike, will need the right motivation, reassurance and mindsets to adopt these new solutions. The companies that know how to offer us tailored, cutting-edge solutions, combined with meaningful advice and trustworthiness, will be the winners and become our trusted advisers in health.

Source: World Economic Forum

Fastaff

Making the transition to working nights may feel a bit intimidating, but many night nurses, myself included, have grown to love the position! It tends to be quieter and less chaotic because the patients are generally asleep, and there's a special camaraderie that develops between a team of night nurses. Put these tips into practice to survive, and even thrive, in your night shifts.

Stack several night shifts in a row: Rather than spacing out your night shifts during the week and having to switch between being up during the day and up during the night, try to put all your night shifts for the week in a row. That way, you can really get yourself onto a schedule of being awake during the nights you work and sleeping during the days in between.

Nap before work: As you transition from being awake during the day to being awake as you work at night, take a nap in the afternoon to help you go into your first night shift as rested as possible. Alternately, if your schedule allows, stay up later than usual the night before your first night shift and sleep in as late as you can the next morning.

Fuel up with healthy foods: While sugars may seem like they provide energy, they also come with a crash. Before heading into work, eat a filling meal with a healthy balance of carbohydrates, protein, and fiber. Then bring healthy snacks for the night that include protein and fiber to keep you going strong. Some options include yogurt, mixed nuts, hard boiled eggs, cheese cubes, or carrots with hummus dip

Plan caffeine carefully: It can be tempting to drink a cup of coffee anytime you feel sleepy, but you may develop an unhealthy dependence or be unable to fall asleep when you get home after your shift. Therefore, try to limit yourself to just one or two cups of coffee per shift, and drink your last one at least six hours before you plan to go to sleep.

Create a restful sleeping environment at home: The key to surviving night shifts in the long term is getting lots of restful sleep after each shift. Set up room darkening curtains and a white noise machine to help you block out signs of the day. When you get home, don't force yourself to go to bed right away. Instead, develop a routine that includes some time to bathe, read, and relax as your body winds down after work. Try to avoid bright screens, which block your body from releasing melatonin, the hormone that makes you feel sleepy.

With some attention to detail, you will probably find yourself really enjoying working at night. Many of the night nurses I know started out stuck on the shifts, but grew to prefer them. Plus, the pay differential doesn't hurt at all!

Source: http://www.fastaff.com

By SYDNEY LUPKIN

At Boston Children’s Hospital, doctors perform practice surgeries with replicas of their patients’ body parts. Though the hospital has had a simulation program for about a decade, it started 3D-printing children’s body parts about a year ago, said Dr. Peter Weinstock, director of the hospital’s simulator program.

“They perfect what they want to do before ever bringing the child into the operating room or putting them to sleep,” Weinstock said.

The models are also used to help parents understand their children’s surgeries before the operation and to educate students afterward, Weinstock said.

The printer is precise, with a resolution of between 16 and 32 microns per layer. That means each layer is about the width of a “filament of cotton,” Weinstock said. And since the printer can print multiple resins or textures, doctors can work on replicas that model different tissue types, like brain matter and blood vessels.

The printer only takes a few hours to do their work once CT scans and other forms of imaging are collected and rendered into 3D models. A child’s finger might take three hours to print, but a chest replica they made last week took longer, Weinstock said.

The team has already printed about 100 body parts over the last year and demand is growing, Weinstock said, adding that the printer is running around the clock.

Dr. Ed Smith, a pediatric neurosurgeon at Boston Children’s, said he recently used several different 3D models to perform brain surgery on a 15-year-old patient with an abnormal cluster of veins above his optical nerve. One wrong maneuver and the patient could have gone blind.

He even used a see-through replica of the patient’s skull on a light box in the operating room as a reference.

“It’s kind of like being superman with X-ray vision where you can actually hold this up and see right through it,” Smith said.

The surgery, which would have normally taken five or six hours, wound up clocking in at 2 hours and 20 minutes, Smith said.

Though Boston Children’s hasn’t conducted any formal studies of how the models help surgeons, Smith said he’s heard anecdotally that they result in shorter surgeries because doctors know what to expect.

Source: http://abcnews.go.com

Emergency department nurses aren't like the rest of us - they are more extroverted, agreeable and open - attributes that make them successful in the demanding, fast-paced and often stressful environment of an emergency department, according to a new study by University of Sydney.

"Emergency nurses are a special breed," says Belinda Kennedy from Sydney Nursing School, a 15 year critical care veteran who led the study.

"Despite numerous studies about personalities of nurses in general, there has been little research done on the personalities of nurses in clinical specialty areas.

"My years working as a critical care nurse has made me aware of the difficulty in retaining emergency nurses and I have observed apparent differences in personality among these specialty groups. This prompted me to undertake this research which is the first on this topic in more than 20 years.

"We found that emergency nurses demonstrated significantly higher levels of openness to experience, agreeableness, and extroversion personality domains compared to the normal population.

"Emergency departments (ED) are a highly stressful environment - busy, noisy, and with high patient turnover. It is the entry point for approximately 40 per cent of all hospital admissions, and the frequency and type of presentations is unpredictable.

"Emergency nurses must have the capacity to care for the full spectrum of physical, psychological and social health problems within their community.

"They must also able to develop a rapport with individuals from all age groups and socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds, in time-critical situations and often at a time when these individuals are at their most vulnerable.

"For these reasons, ED staff experience high levels of stress and emotional exhaustion, so it's understandable that it takes a certain personality type to function in this working environment.

"Our research findings have potential implications for workforce recruitment and retention in emergency nursing.

"With ever-increasing demands on emergency services it is necessary to consider how to enhance the recruitment and retention of emergency nurses in public hospitals. Assessment of personality and knowledge of its influence on specialty selection may assist in improving this.

"The retention of emergency nurses not only has potential economic advantages, but also a likely positive impact on patient care and outcomes, as well as improved morale among the nursing workforce," she said.

Since this article is from Aulstralia, do you agree that Emergency Room Nurses in the US should have the same characteristics to be successful in a US Emergency Room?

Source: http://sydney.edu.au

By Robert Preidt

Many children get anxious or afraid when they have to get a vaccination, but there are a number of ways that parents can make these shots easier for their kids, an expert suggests.

The first step is to explain to children in an age-appropriate way that the vaccinations help protect their health, said Rita John, director of the pediatric primary care nurse practitioner program at Columbia University School of Nursing in New York City.

"Children need to know that vaccines aren't a punishment or something negative, vaccines are something that keeps them from getting sick," John said in a Columbia news release. "When parents are anxious, they pass that fear on to their kids. The best way to talk about vaccines is to keep the conversation positive and focused on the benefits of vaccination."

Before a vaccination, you can reduce toddlers' and preschoolers' anxiety if you give them a toy medical kit so that they can give pretend shots to you or a favorite doll or other toy.

When you arrive for the shot, ask the clinician to use a numbing cream or spray to limit the pain caused by the needle. Blowing on a bubble maker or a pinwheel can help distract younger children during vaccinations, while listening to music, playing games or texting may benefit older children and teens.

"If the kids think something is going to reduce their pain, there can be a placebo effect where the technique works because they expect it to work," John explained.

"It doesn't matter so much what you use to make your child more comfortable so long as you do something that acknowledges that they may experience some pain and that they can do something to make it hurt less," she added.

Be sure to reward and/or praise children after a vaccination. For example, give stickers to younger children. "You want the final part of the experience to make kids feel like even if they suffered some momentary pain, it was worth it," John said.

"Good play preparation, a positive attitude about immunization, and bringing something to distract kids during the shots can all help make the experience better," she concluded.

Source: http://www.nlm.nih.gov

By Bill Toland

Pharmacy errors, hard-to-find clinical alerts, “farcical” training, and potentially life-threatening design flaws: Reading through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s catalog of electronic medical records malfunctions could be hazardous to your mental health.

If not yours, than that of the physicians and nurses who must work with the records systems, and who are reporting their experiences to the FDA’s adverse event database, otherwise known as MAUDE (the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience).

Most of the events submitted to the database involve misfiring medical equipment — broken aerosol compressors, faulty defibrillators — but as electronic records and computerized physician-order entry systems take hold at hospitals and clinics across the country, complaints about those systems are on the rise.  

For decades, electronic patient records systems have been heralded as a potential game-changer for the health care industry, leading to improved patient health outcomes, fewer duplicate tests and, eventually, savings for the health care industry.

While most clinicians and academics still believe the promise is there, the systems are coming under increased scrutiny from doctors, nurses and some on Capitol Hill who say the technology is poorly regulated, often unproven and occasionally unreliable. 

As such, the health records systems haven’t yet lived up the promise that was made when the Obama administration won passage its 2009 stimulus bill, which included $25.8 billion for health IT investments and incentive payments.

“Like with any new technology, there’s going to be unintended consequences,” said William M. Marella, director of Patient Safety Reporting Programs for the suburban Philadelphia Emergency Care Research Institute. He’s also director of the state’s Patient Safety Reporting System, which tracks adverse events and near-misses in Pennsylvania.

“In the long run, [electronic health records] will make us safer than we were” using paper records, Mr. Marella said. “But in the short term, we’ve got a lot of [implementation] issues that need to be addressed before [electronic health records] meet their promise.” 

Last month, the nation’s largest union of registered nurses sent a letter to the FDA asking for broader and more stringent oversight of electronic records systems and of computerized physician-order entry systems, which allow clinicians to log treatment instructions for patients.

The National Nurses United, as part of its broader campaign highlighting the potential dangers of “unproven medical technology,” says FDA officials should test electronic medical records as rigorously as they might a new drug or an artificial hip implant.

“I don’t think that opinion is an outlier opinion,” Mr. Marella said. “Lots of clinicians are unhappy with the way these systems work, and are unhappy with the documentation burden we put on them.”

The nurses union also wants the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to suspend its “meaningful use” program, which requires providers to start installing electronic medical records systems at the risk losing Medicare funding, “unless and until we have unbiased, robust research showing that [electronic health records] can and do, in fact, improve patient health and save lives.”

To date, since 2011, that CMS program has issued nearly $24 billion to hospitals and physicians clinics seeking to upgrade their electronic records systems and make the transition away from paper records.

Tracking the errors

The letter submitted by the nurses union to the FDA was part of the commentary related to the federal government’s proposed overhaul of its framework for regulating health IT. That draft proposal was published in April, a joint effort of the FDA, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Federal Communications Commission and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT.

Others offered their own responses. The College of Healthcare Information Management Executives and the Association of Medical Directors of Information Systems, in joint comments to the FDA, said that the government needs a retooled electronic health records certification program in order to “identify clear standards and require strict adherence to those standards.”

The report itself noted that “a nationwide health information technology infrastructure can offer tremendous benefits to the American public, including the prevention of medical errors, improved efficiency and health care quality, [and] reduced costs. … However, if health IT is not designed, developed, implemented, maintained, or used properly, it can pose risks to patients.” 

Patient risk was a concern when, last summer, UnitedHealth Group Inc. recalled software that was used in hospital emergency rooms in more than 20 states “because of an error that caused doctor’s notes about patient prescriptions to drop out of their files,” according to Bloomberg News. There were no reports of patient harm, a UnitedHealth spokesman said, but the glitch illustrates the potential pitfalls for digital health records.

The MAUDE system, which accepts voluntary and anonymous incident reports from practitioners, and Mr. Marella’s own reporting have turned up plenty of other glitches. Some involve human error, others involve software and interoperability malfunctions, and many are simply design flaws, such as this example from a 2012 Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority report:

Patient with documented allergy to penicillin received ampicillin and went into shock, possibly due to anaphylaxis. Allergy written on some order sheets [but] never linked to pharmacy drug dictionary.

And this one, from MAUDE: 

Potassium chloride was prescribed twice per day as treatment for hypokalemia. The lab testing revealed a [bad] jump in the potassium level, but the result came to the EHR without alert or warning, and the nurses continued to give the patient potassium anyway [because] the nurse did not know that the potassium level was high. ... Though this patient did not die, others have from this type of defect.

Or this one, from 2013: 

Patient’s medication list and other active orders did not appear on the doctor’s order section on the CPOE system, rendering it impossible for the doctor to confirm, alter, and reconcile the medication list. ... For obvious reasons, this defect in the CPOE is potentially life threatening when the doctor(s) do not have access to the current medication list.

And from April: 

A patient [was] at risk for respiratory arrest due to a narrowing in the trachea. There is no place on the EHR to list such a life-threatening condition that would be visible to each and every care team member who opened the EHR for this patient. ...  Care was delayed due to the above mentioned reasons, [and] the patient sustained a complete respiratory arrest that led to a cardiac arrest and anoxic brain injury.

Human factors 

While examples of electronic health records problems can be retrieved via various state and federal databases, many in the medical field say tracking the issues in a more comprehensive way will lead to better systems. Mandatory reporting would help, too, since only a fraction of adverse events related to electronic health records are actually reported to the FDA or state authorities. 

But health IT vendors are against mandatory reporting, or any other system that would run afoul of the confidentiality clauses that are built into contracts with hospitals and clinics. Public, mandatory confessions of errors might also discourage such reporting, since the clinician who admits the error could be punished by his or her employer. 

“We have felt that reporting by both providers and vendors should be voluntary. That is most consistent with the notion of a learning environment,” said Mark Segal, the chairman of the Electronic Health Records Association, told The Boston Globe.

Clinicians, too, are also wary about striking the right balance. “FDA oversight and regulation could slow innovation,” particularly if electronic health records and related systems are indeed scrutinized like other medical devices, according to a letter to the FDA from American Medical Association CEO James Madara. 

And they have the FDA on their side. The agency does not intend to require the reporting of electronic health records-related adverse events, and does not intend to vet electronic health records in the same way that it reviews drugs and other medical devices.

But when push comes to shove, though, regulators should err on the side of safety, said Dean Kross, a cardiologist in private practice at the Allegheny Health Network and a longtime critic of electronic health record companies and the side effects of health IT adoption. 

“The vendors have not been held accountable for the devices they are manufacturing,” he said. There is negligible pre-installation vetting, or post-market surveillance, for “safety, usability and efficacy,” he said.

And regulators should keep a watchful eye on human usability.

“Ninety percent of [complaints] have got something to do with faulty user-device interaction,” said Robert A. North, chief scientist at Human Centered Strategies, a Colorado company that studies and seeks to reduce risk and error in medical device design. “It’s not that something that is breaking or freezing. ... it’s nothing to do with the electronic circuit board. It’s the human circuit board.”

While Mr. Marella is aware of the design shortcomings of electronic health records, he’s still a believer that the systems can, and are, improving patient and population health.

He points to the example of a Pennsylvania hospital that noticed some its patients were overdosing on narcotic painkillers while in the hospital, and had to be given reversal agents to mitigate the overdose symptoms. When clinicians dug into the electronic records, they saw that the overdoses were happening primarily among people being given painkillers for the first time.

“So they decided that the default dose was actually too high” for first-time opioid recipients, and adjusted the first-time dosage going forward, Mr. Marella said. Identifying a hospital-wide problem, and addressing it quickly, probably couldn’t have happened without electronic health records.

“We really have to do a lot more work in what we call human factors,” so that the systems are intuitive, he said. “We’re quite a long ways from there.”

Source: www.nationalnursesunited.org

By Cornell University

In a forthcoming Cornell study published in the journal Health Environments Research and Design, Rana Zadeh, assistant professor of design and environmental analysis, discovered nurses who had access to natural light enjoyed significantly lower blood pressure, communicated more often with their colleagues, laughed more and served their patients in better moods than nurses who settled for large doses of artificial light.

Letting natural light into the nurses’ workstations offered improved alertness and mood restoration effects. “The increase in positive sociability, as measured by the occurrence of frequent laughter, was … significant,” noted Zadeh in the paper.

Nurses work long shifts, during non-standardized hours. They work on demanding and sensitive tasks and their alertness is connected to both staff and patient safety. Past evidence indicates natural light and views have restorative effects on people both physiologically and psychologically. Maximizing access to natural daylight and providing quality lighting design in nursing areas may be an opportunity to improve safety though environmental design and enable staff to manage sleepiness, work in a better mood and stay alert, according to Zadeh.

“Nurses save lives and deal with complications every day. It can be a very intense and stressful work environment, which is why humor and a good mood are integral to the nursing profession,” Zadeh said. “As a nurse, it’s an art to keep your smile – which helps ensure an excellent connection to patients. A smart and affordable way to bring positive mood – and laughter – into the workplace, is designing the right workspace for it.”

Access to natural daylight, and a nice view to outside, should be provided for clinical workspace design, said Zadeh. In situations where natural light is not possible, she suggests optimizing electric lighting in terms of spectrum, intensity and variability to support circadian rhythms and work performance.

“The physical environment in which the caregivers work on critical tasks should be designed to support a high-performing and healthy clinical staff,” she said “ improving the physiological and psychological wellbeing of healthcare staff, by designing the right workspace, can directly benefit the organization’s outcomes”.

In addition to Zadeh, this study, “The Impact of Windows and Daylight on Acute-Care Nurses’ Physiological, Psychological, and Behavioral Health,” was authored by Mardelle Shepley, Texas A&M University; Cornell doctoral candidate Susan Sung Eun Chung; and Gary Williams, MSN, RN. The research was supported by the Center for Health Design Research Coalition’s New Investigator Award.

Source: www.sciencedaily.com

By MICHELLE ANDREWS

School nurses today do a lot more than bandage skinned knees. They administer vaccines and medications, help diabetic students monitor their blood sugar, and prepare teachers to handle a student's seizure or asthma attack, among many other things.

And though school nurses see many students regularly, they don't always have the most up-to-date information about the students' health. School nurses must get permission from parents to communicate with a child's doctor. Once the doctor gives them a care plan for the child, they generally rely on the doctor and/or parents for updates and changes.

"When things change, we don't always get told in a timely manner," says Nina Fekaris, a school nurse in the Beaverton, Ore., school district. "It works, but it takes a lot of coordination."

At the same time, school-based health care is unfamiliar territory to many medical professionals, who operate in a health care universe largely separate from school clinics and other community-based medical services.

In Delaware, "lots of nurses expressed that they had difficulty communicating with providers" at Nemours Health System, which serves children around the state, according to Claudia Kane, program manager of the Student Health Collaboration at Nemours.

In 2011, Nemours got together with the Delaware School Nurses Association and the state Department of Education to develop a program that, with parental approval, gives school nurses read-only access to the electronic health records of more than 1,500 students who have complex medical conditions or special needs. That includes conditions such as diabetes, asthma, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, seizure disorders or gastrointestinal problems.

Beth Mattey, a school nurse in Wilmington, says that now that she has access to the Nemours system, she can check the recent lab test results of a student who has diabetes. "It's helpful for me to monitor his [blood sugar levels] and work with him to make sure he's in better control," says Mattey, who is president-elect of the National Association of School Nurses.

When a student put a staple through his finger, Mattey was able to check to make sure he went to the doctor and got treatment. "Checking with him directly involves calling him out of class," she says.

Eventually, school nurses will be able to put information into the Nemours electronic records system as well, says Kane.

In the meantime, Nemours doctors, some of whom were initially skeptical about allowing school nurses access to health system medical records, are warming up to the arrangement. Kane says it encourages communication between physicians and school nurses, and eases the burden of routine tasks because Nemours doctors no longer have to fax over care plans or instructions to the school nurse every few months for students who are part of the program.

The Nemours Student Health Collaboration project is operating in all Delaware public school districts as well as half of charter schools and about one-third of private schools. Kane says Nemours plans to extend the program to school-based health centers next.

Source: npr.org

Do you think they should have access to medical records?

By Joan Banovic

Judge's notes: This team made a change for the greater good. The initiative benefits not just the hospital but their community and beyond. They used a scientific, research-based approach and gained support from multidiscipline teams, management and administration.

It started with a single question: "Why can't I recycle this?" In the main operating room, we perform approximately 1,500 cases per month, all requiring sterile instrumentation, sterile water, sterile saline, packaged sterile supplies and implants. All of our supplies are packaged in disposable recyclable material. Operating rooms across the country contribute the largest amount of municipal trash in a hospital, secondary only to food services. If we were able to recycle half of what we used, we could make a major impact not only to our landfills and community, but potentially our small part of the world.

Jennifer Pallotta, BSN, RN, CNOR, inpatient operating room, masterminded the project. She empowered all who chose to become involved. Together, Jennifer and I spearheaded this massive undertaking. We gathered nurses, technicians, anesthesiologists and the Environmental Services Department staff to help assist with our endeavor. Together, we would all make a difference.

Our first step was educating ourselves in the art of recycling. We did it at home; how difficult could it be? We spoke with our managers and gained support and buy-in, for without them this huge practice change would have never been achievable. We joined our hospital-based "Green Team" and educated ourselves on what would be required. We then began to educate the staff, slowly introducing the concept of recycling product from the operating room. Surgery and anesthesia chairmen were informed of our initiative via emails and introductions at committee meetings. It was imperative that we had the surgery and anesthesia staff as involved as the perioperative personnel. An area of concern would be the Environmental Services Department, for without them our study could be in jeopardy. We were amazed at the enthusiasm that they displayed when we began our educational process with them. We informed them that without their support, our study would surely fail. It was a priority for Jennifer and me to ensure that they were comfortable with the process, and truly understood what a driving force their support would be. By empowering the Environmental Service Department, we gained allies that would last much longer than our study.

We initiated a pilot program. Phase I we monitored and measured five operating rooms: ENT/gynecological, laparoscopic, orthopedic, robotic and neurosurgical procedures. We would do this for a period of one month, three times a week. We would base our results on the amount of trash (weight) that we produced, separating only red bag waste from regular trash.

Coincidentally, the end of Phase I coincided with our institution's signing a Memorandum of Understanding with the Environmental Protection Agency. Not only did we have buy-in and support from our managers, but we also received support from our president and chief executive officer, as well as our executive vice president and chief nursing and patient care officer.
Once the one-month period was complete and we had our baseline statistics, the real fun began. We would need to educate staff on recycling of operating room supplies: What could be recycled as opposed to what could not be. What material was acceptable, and what we needed to watch out for. We began an educational program that consisted of in-services, posters, banners and giveaways. Jennifer and I made ourselves available at all times for questions and answers for whoever had concerns.

Phase II of our project began with the same five operating rooms, but the difference is that a recycling trash receptacle was now added. We learned from Phase I of our study that the majority of supplies placed into the red hazardous waste bag did not need to be there. A serendipitous moment came when we were able to remove the red bag receptacle from the operating rooms, and only have it available upon need. We were able to reduce our red bag waste by 50% percent; not only eliminating the financial cost of the bags, but also dramatically decreasing the cost of disposal.

During Phase II of our study we continued positive reinforcement, taking pictures of staff recycling to encourage the team. The staff members enjoyed seeing their photos displayed on the bulletin boards - all caught in the act of recycling. The staff began to take pride and ownership in the project, and began to realize that they were making a difference in something that they had full control over. Acts of positive peer pressure began to emerge. Recycling even caught on with our surgeons being more vigilant on where they disposed of their gowns and gloves; not wanting to contaminate the recyclable items.

The end of Phase II was celebrated amongst the staff. We held a party during our monthly staff in-service decorating the room, serving coffee and breakfast to the staff. We celebrated the fact that we as a team were able to increase our recycling by 34%, hence decreasing 34% of municipal waste that is dumped into our landfills. We cut our hazardous red bag waste by 50%, eliminating the cost of supplies of red bags as well as disposal fees. Our celebration ended with each registered nurse entering the operating suite with a 64-gallon blue recycling bin for each of the 22 operating rooms in the main operating arena. 

This greening initiative was very exciting. The recycling bug caught on. In an age where hospitals need to remain conscious of the earth and be aware of the potential hazards that we can add to the environment, the act of giving back and being green is something that we all can do. By recycling in the operating room, we showed the rest of the medical center that it was certainly possible for them to participate and play a part in this new culture.

This was truly the start of a new era all arising from one simple question, "Why can't I recycle this?"

What is your place of employment doing about recycling? 

Source: nursing.advanceweb.com

By Heather Stringer

When Carrie Bilicki, RN, MSN, ACNS-BC, OCN, met a 60-year-old patient who had been diagnosed with aggressive endometrial cancer, she began to have a persistent — albeit unconventional — idea. 

Bilicki, a cancer nurse navigator in Wisconsin at the time, recently had attended a lecture about a progressive treatment for this type of cancer that involved using a chemotherapy drug traditionally prescribed for ovarian cancer. The patient’s cancer had spread to nearby organs, and she had a poor prognosis. Bilicki convinced the physicians to try the alternative medication. Unfortunately, the patient faced another serious hurdle: The insurance company would not cover the cost of the medication because it was not the standard treatment. At that point, the woman seemed to face the unenviable choice between cancer treatment and financial ruin.

Although patients and providers would like to hope this type of extreme dilemma is the exception, the case may be representative of the near future for two reasons. First, as a 60-year-old, the woman was a baby boomer, and researchers predict the incidence of cancer will increase dramatically as this large segment of the population ages. According to a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 2009, the U.S. can expect a 67% increase in cancer incidence among older adults between 2010 and 2030. 

Second, statistics suggest cancer treatment is becoming increasingly unaffordable, even for those with insurance who struggle to afford steep copayments. For example, The US Oncology Network — a national group of about 1,000 oncology physicians who treat more than 750,000 cancer patients per year — reported about half of the patients covered by a Medicare Part D plan have required copay assistance for oral chemotherapy for the past several years.

“My message to my peers is to know the financial resources available because there are hundreds of them,” Bilicki, who now is a clinical nurse specialist in breast services at Froedtert Center for Diagnostic Imaging in Milwaukee, Wis., said. “There are foundations, specialty organizations and websites that tell us where to get help. If a patient does not have an advocate to link them to that resource, they will never know it is available.” 

What's new?

For many patients, the desire to find a way to afford medication is driven not only by the fact that they have cancer, but also because the treatment options available today have increased the odds of survival. 

“By far one of the biggest advancements is more personalized medicine that targets cancer cells rather than traditional chemotherapy that did not differentiate between good and bad cells,” Kim George, RN, MSN, ACNS-BC, OCN, a cancer program consultant from Wichita Falls, Texas, said. “For example, now we can test biopsy tissue for specific tumor antigens and biomarkers and then prescribe treatments that target those antigens.” 

The advancements in cancer treatment also are reflected in improved survival rates. According to the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2009, for example, the 5-year survival rate for breast cancer among women in the U.S. between 1975 and 1977 was 75%. Between 2002 and 2008 that number jumped to 90%. During the same time periods, the 5-year survival rate for both men and women with colon cancer has increased from 50% to 65%. 

“Another major advancement has been the increase in availability of oral chemotherapy and biotherapy,” George said. “It has shifted the care setting. Years ago, the majority of cancer patients received IV infusions, and now more patients can take their medication orally at home. It is wonderful for convenience, and it is also less painful.” 

However, George said, reimbursement is not always a given with oral chemotherapy. “A lot of oncology medications are given off-label, which means that the FDA has not approved a drug for a specific diagnosis, so it may not be covered by some insurance policies,” she said. 

Point the way

The art of navigating the path to financial assistance for cancer medication is not simple, and organizations such as The US Oncology Network, based in The Woodlands, Texas, have hired professionals to help patients connect with funding resources and launched the OncologyRx Care Advantage pharmacy in 2006. Nurses in the network can refer patients to Care Advantage staff who help them apply for financial assistance. 

“The types of drugs used to treat cancer today are definitely more expensive than when I started working in oncology almost 30 years ago,” said Lori Lindsey, RN, MSN, NP, OCN, a clinical services program manager with The US Oncology Network. “Multidrug regimens, including oral targeted therapies, can sometimes cost $30,000 for a round of treatment, although the use of these drugs has markedly improved outcomes and increased survival for some diseases.” 

For patients who are uninsured, the best option is to apply directly to the drug manufacturer for patient assistance, said Meg Asher, a patient access coordinator/patient advocate lead at the Care Advantage pharmacy. “When we learn that a patient is without insurance, we notify the doctor’s office and send a manufacturer’s application to them for the patient’s use,” Asher said. “Under these circumstances, we will not be the dispensing pharmacy; the manufacturer has their own specified pharmacy that will service the patient.”

Even those who are insured under Medicare Part D often require assistance because the copayments can be thousands of dollars, Asher said. For these patients, the Care Advantage advocate team helps patients connect with various foundations that provide copay assistance in the form of grants. Some of the foundations assist patients who suffer from a specific disease, while others help those who are taking a specific drug for a disease. 

While some facilities have staff trained to help patients find financial assistance, this is not always the case. For these patients, one resource is the Patient Advocate Foundation, a nonprofit organization with case managers who help patients with life-threatening illnesses to maintain financial stability. 

“When I was a hospital nurse, I honestly didn’t know about a lot of the resources available to help patients after they left my care,” Pat Jolley, RN, the clinical director of research and reporting at PAF, said. “Many people have never had to ask for financial help in the past, and they are unaware that there are options. If they are newly diagnosed, we try to educate them about the likely expenses down the road to help identify potential problems. In my experience, when patients contact us saying they cannot afford one thing, it is usually just the tip of the iceberg.” 

For example, PAF assisted a 62-year-old woman with breast cancer who was insured, but she was having difficulty scheduling her needed mastectomy because of outstanding medical bills. She was living on Social Security disability payments, and her insurance did not cover surgeries, scans or tests. The woman received a bill for $50,000 that included the cost of previous care and several office visits. By negotiating with the hospital and the providers, the PAF case manager was able to reduce the bill to a total of $950 and also facilitate the scheduling of her mastectomy. 

Suffering in silence

For Bilicki, one of her personal goals is to encourage patients to consider the financial aspect of their cancer care before they decide to pursue a particular form of treatment. 
“Nobody wants to talk about their financial state, and I think far too often patients suffer in silence rather than saying that they are having trouble with copayments, so what I do is proactively tell them about some of the resources,” Bilicki said. “Just because they have insurance does not mean they will have resources to afford the costs, so I empower all patients right off the bat to proactively seek out assistance if they need it.”

After patients have been diagnosed with cancer, Bilicki encourages them to learn about the resources at the American Cancer Society, which has patient navigators trained to help people connect with financial resources. She also tells them about a group called Patient Resource LLC, which has a website and a patient magazine that includes national, state and local resources available for financial assistance. 
In the case of the woman with endometrial cancer who could not afford a medication that was not covered by her insurance, Bilicki helped her apply for the drug manufacturer’s patient assistance program. Based on her income and medical necessity, she qualified for full assistance. She was on the medication for 15 months, and, despite her initial grim prognosis, the cancer has been in remission for the past five years. 

“I can always remember the tears and fear in their eyes when I first meet patients, and each time it feels like I’ve won the lottery when I help them secure the treatment they need, and they start smiling again,” Bilicki said. “Part of my big mission for my colleagues is to advocate for these patients so they do not miss out on options that can change their lives.” 

A little help can mean a lot

Point the way for patients who need assistance financing cancer treatments, by seeking resources such as the following:

• PatientAdvocate.org — Provides sources for copay assistance and answers questions about disability and insurance processes
• PatientResource.com — Features information on different types of cancer, newsletters and financial and advocacy resources
• CureToday.com — Provides an extensive list of national resources for advocacy, financial and pharmaceutical assistance
• RxOutreach.org — A nonprofit organization that helps low-income families who cannot afford the medication they need 
• CDFund.org — Chronic Disease Fund — A nonprofit organization that helps patients obtain lifesaving medications
For a list of drug assistance programs from pharmaceutical companies, visit Cancersupportivecare.com/drug_assistance.html.

Source: Nurse.com